Gina Penn, unabridged.

Indie Done Right

It is a misconception to assume that an indie writer doesn’t work hard. On the contrary, we work extremely hard.

That’s not to say that all indie writers work hard. We’re no different from traditionally published writers. There are those who work very hard and those who do not. Since storytelling is so subjective, it is almost impossible to judge who works harder than who. There is no yardstick to measure who’s been spending time molding their craft into perfection and who simply dabbles, which, to the lazy writer, can make writing for a living seem like a pretty sweet deal. Sure, we have the Chicago Style Guide and the dictionary to tell us who’s getting it technically right. But is the English language really so technical? If we lived in England, I would be inclined to say yes. But we don’t, at least I don’t, and my English language has a scruffy charm that I expect to come out just right in the books that I read. If it doesn’t, I put it down fast.

Technically right all the time  =  boring! If I wanted to read something that didn’t take any chances, I’d read an instruction manual.

Lately, I’ve been spending quite a bit of time reading indie books. Some are great and some not so great. For me, there are a lot of reasons why a book might not be so great. Maybe the story is unoriginal. Maybe the characters aren’t becoming meaningful to me, maybe the conflict isn’t resonating. I can ignore a few grammatical errors, passive voice, and bad commas without it interrupting the flow of the story. But these problems are not solely an issue with indies. I’ve found that the more indie books I read, and the more I compare them with gatekeeper books, that I prefer the indie characters over the ones that the gatekeepers let through.

Why? Because indie authors can take chances.

Their characters are rich and unsupervised. Unfiltered and unsung. Their voices are real. Pure street poetry. Greatness has to start somewhere and it isn’t as meaningful if it begins institutionally. I won’t deny that some of the greatest literary characters ever written were traditionally published-of course they were-but I often wonder what they might have said had they been allowed to say it.

Big publishing is like censored ABC. Indie is like uncensored HBO.

Would you rather see a sunrise on a movie screen or does it pack a bigger punch when viewed in real life in raw nature?

This isn’t to say I completely shun structure and correctness. There are a lot of things that indie writers can be doing to up their game. I’m not perfect either, not by half, but I’ll do everything within my power to get it right the first time.

As the tide starts to turn and indies are viewed in a more positive light by those that choose to trudge the traditional path, (what’s so abhorrent about indie musicians? or indie movies?) we will face quite a lot of tyranny from the other side on our way. There’s room for all of us in this ocean of a book world. So you go ahead and make money.

I’ll make history.

2 responses

  1. I loke this post. As an indie writer I am the first to admit my work is not perfect. I’m a storyteller. I write to tell an interesting story, to entertain for a few bucks, to take the reader away from the everyday world for a few hours. If I succeed, then I am pleased. If my writing errors offend thee, then perhaps thee would be happier reading an english textbook. Ok, end of rant. Great Post Gina.

    Bless, Prudence

    August 6, 2011 at 9:07 pm

  2. This was an interesting read.

    August 16, 2011 at 4:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s